Categories
Blogroll
- Cognition and Language Lab
- Cognitive Daily
- COMD News
- Confessions of a Language Addict
- DCBlog (David Crystal’s)
- Deric Bownds’ Mindblog
- Dr. Goodword’s Language Blog
- English, Jack
- Free Language Stuff
- Language for You
- Language is the People’s
- Language Log
- Languagehat
- LD Blog
- Learning is Messy
- Mind Hacks
- PsychCentral
- SpedPro
- Speech-Language-Development.Com
- Speechlanguage-Resources
- Teach Effectively!
- The Linguist Blogger
- UCL Library Speech and Language Internet Resources
- WordPress.com
- For tons of great language teaching material check out Free Language Stuff! (freelanguagestuff.com) On this sister site you will find material for oral language, written language, and reading, all categorized by specific language targets. And all of it FREE!
Archives
-
Top Posts
- The Hart-Risley 30 Million Word Gap Study - 1995
- Which Language Development Theory Best Helps Us Teach?
- Recent Research - Baby Vocab and Gestures Linked
- Jerome Bruner - Research Rehash
- How Many Words Should A Child Know?
- Following Directions
- Commentary - Underestimating Pragmatics
- On Teaching Vocabulary
- Nicaraguan Sign Language
- Research Rehash - Albert Bandura
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Study Shows Language Driven by Culture, Not Biology
January 22, 2009 at 12:24 pm | In Commentary, Recent Research | Leave a CommentTags: baldwin effect, explanation, language evolution, study, universal grammar
I like learning new things that may have future relevance. That’s why this story from Science Daily especially appealed to me. It taught me about the Baldwin Effect, an effect relevant enough to have over 9 million Google search results, and a Wikipedia entry, yet something I’d never heard of. Essentially, the Baldwin Effect can be a sort of an evolutionary short cut from learning to instinct. Animals that have a predisposition to learning anything (like language) that enhances its survivability can turn that anything into an instinct under lengthy continuous circumstances. The study authors conclude that a “universal grammar” must have arisen by societal impetus that predates the relatively recent divergence of language over the last 100,000 years.
I personally believe the univeral grammar is an invention that describes a phenomenon that occurs because of universal human needs. Because (nearly) all humans need to describe things that have happened, we get past tense, for instance. There are guys and gals in all human cultures, and they all possess things, so we get possessive pronouns. What linguistic construct exists that has been used as support for universal grammar, and is useful to one group of humans, but not another? Let me know if you come up with one.